This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. According to some that believe in God and feel that the death penalty is acceptable under the scriptures, make one main point, which is that "This is not an issue that may be measured accurately in terms of statistics. No one can ever know how many potential murderers have refrained from taking human life due to their fear of prosecution, conviction buying research papers cheap, and ultimate execution" (Jackson, 2003). It is also questioned during this same argument that those who conclude that the death penalty is not a deterrent to violent crime should also be able to conclude that prison is not a deterrent either, since people seem to keep committing crimes cochrane literature review criteria, whether or not they think they will go to jail. The same is true for juvenile offenders. Some juveniles that are convicted of violent crimes are locked away in prison until such time as they are old enough to be executed, which really does not teach juveniles anything valuable about the death penalty or avoidance of violent crime. More often than not, these juveniles are not executed, and most juveniles know that they will not receive the death penalty, even if they are tried as adults, so they are not deterred by the possibility (Radelet & Akers, 1996). There are other arguments, but the most effective argument against the death penalty as a deterrent for violent crime appears to be the fact that crime has not gone down simply because the death penalty is out there (Death, 2000). States that have it do not have lower crime rates on average than states that do not have it, and that would indicate that the death penalty in and of itself is not stopping people from committing violent acts (Ikramullah, 2003). Capital punishment, which some also call the death penalty, has been around in society for hundreds of years. Ever since it began, there have been discussions as to whether it is morally right, and as to whether it actually deters criminals. Some believe that the prospect of being put to death often stops criminals from committing violent acts. Others believe exactly the opposite, stating that those that commit violent crimes are driven to do so for various reasons, and whether they have the chance of being put to death or not will not stop them from doing what they feel they must do. Instead, they end up spending their life in prison, where they get hot meals every day, are allowed to exercise, and have a bed to sleep in every night. They watch TV and read books, and this is more than many of the hungry and homeless in today's society get. Criminals are treated better than many of these people. The criminals have lost their freedom, but they get a lot of things in return for that, and society is required to pay for them through taxes and other avenues that fund the prisons. Published: 23rd March, 2015 Last Edited: 23rd March, 2015 Both sides of the argument will be addressed here, so that conclusions can be drawn from the information presented that will hopefully shed some light on the debate and determine which side is correct. There is, however, seemingly much more information available that is against the death penalty than for it. It is also possible that a determination will not be able to be made due to the fact that there are so many issues and beliefs that surround each side, and statistics can be made to show many things, depending on who is utilizing them and how the numbers are manipulated. It is for this reason that statistics will not play a large role in the scope of this paper, as numbers often vary. in a world of imperfect information, innocent individuals may be convicted and executed before exonerating information is discovered, and those contemplating criminal activities do not rationally weigh the benefits and costs of their actions,
Given the prevalence of the death penalty in the modern world, it is fair to assume that there are perhaps justifications for it, though there are plenty of people who categorically oppose it. Without going into the details of any given judicial system, there are number of reasons to support both sides of the argument. Officially, thousands of people are sentenced to death every year in countries where the death penalty is practiced. The death penalty is still prevalent in many parts of the world, especially in the Middle East, Asia, and North Africa, with notable countries including Iraq, Egypt, Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, and the USA. Fear of Death Does not Reduce Crime. detected. But such miscarriage of justice do not There are too many stories like these where people deserve the death penalty for killing other people. If they are released from prison, they will kill other innocent lives again. We should weigh the death of the convicted murders penalty, we must ask ourselves which action will Most people have a natural fear of death- its a trait man have to think about what will happen before we act. If we don’t think about it consciously, we will think about it unconsciously. Think- if every murderer who killed someone died instantly, the homicide rate would be very low because no one likes to die. We cannot do this, but if the Justice system can make it more swift and severe, we could change the laws to make capital punishment faster and make appeals a shorter process. The death penalty is important because it could save the lives of thousands of potential victims who are at stake (Bedau, H. 1982). She said she would have gone to see her husband being executed if he lived because she didn’t want him out again. She said, “To me, I think for the most part, I didn’t care what happened to him. I just didn’t want him to be out again after what he did. I told the District Attorney that I was afraid that he would get out and try to finish what he started” (Email, personal communication- March 31, 2000). Crime growth has been going up in the past because of too much leniency going hand in hand with the increased rate of people being victimized. There are many loop holes devised for offenders, and because of that crime rate has increased drastically. Between l960 to 1968 crime rate increased 11 times. More and more people are being murdered, raped, assaulted, kidnapped, and robbed, etc. (Isenberg, I. 1997). In arguments of the death penalty, there are two lives to think about. Too much emphasis is placed on the convicted murderer, the one being executed, and the victim is all forgotten. When the assailant is apprehended and charged, he has the power of the judicial process who protects his constitutional rights. What about the victim? The assailant may have compassion from investigating officers, families and friends. Furthermore, the criminal may have organized campaigns of propaganda to build sympathy for him as if he is the one who has been sinned against. These false claims are publicized, for no reason, hence, protecting the criminal (Isenberg, I. 1977). empirical evidence supporting or refuting this view. violence or aggression. In the question of the death Deterrent or Revenge Death is an experience that cannot be experienced and ends all experience. Because it is unknown as it is certain, death is universally feared. “The life of a man should be sacred to each other (Bedau, H. 1982, p. 330)”. Could the same effect be achieved by putting the criminal in prison for life? “Life in prison” means in six months the parole board can release the man to 12 years in some states. “But even if it were real life imprisonment, it’s deterrent effect will never be as great as that of the death penalty. The death penalty is the only actually irrevocable penalty. Because of that, it is the one that people fear the most (Isenberg, I. 1977). In a foot note Bedau (1982) cites, “Actually being dead is no different from not being born, a (non) experience we all had before being born. But death is not realized. The process of dying which is a different matter is usually confused with it. In turn, dying is feared because death is expected, even though death is feared because it is confused with dying (p. 338)”. In 1958 the10 states that had the fewest murders –fewer Irwin Isenberg (1977) said, when you kill a man with premeditation, you do something different than stealing from him. “I favor the death penalty as a matter of justice and human dignity even apart from deterrence. The penalty must be appropriate to the seriousness of the crime (p. 135). Huggo A. Bedau (1982) states one popular objection to Capital punishment is that it gratifies the desire for revenge regarding as unworthy. The bible quotes the Lord declaring “Vengeance is mine” (Romans 12:19). He thus legitimized vengeance and reserved it to Himself. However, the Bible also enjoins, “The murderer shall surely be put warrant abolition at the death penalty. Unless the deterrent than lesser penalties, there is no convincing miscarriage of justice that must be opposed whenever Iowa, Minnesota, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Wisconsin, the death penalty undoubtedly, is a significant deterrent. Rhode Island, Utah, North Dakota and Washington. Four of to death” (Numbers 35:16-18), recognizing that the death penalty can be warranted whatever the motive. Religious tradition certainly suggest no less (p. 330). What is Capital punishment? Capital punishment is the death penalty. It is used today and was used in ancient times to punish a variety of offenses. Even the bible advocates death for murder and other crimes like kidnapping and witchcraft. innocent bystanders. Nevertheless, advantages outweigh fourteen killings per100,000 population were Nevada, medicine, manufacturing, automobile, and air traffic, sports, DEATH PENALTY ARGUMENTS: in 27 states. When there was a moratorium on Capital Punishment in the United States, the study showed murder rates increased by 100%. The study also reviewed 14 nations who abolished the death penalty. It (the study) claimed murder increased by 7% from five years before the abolition period to the five years after the abolition (Internet). FOR THE DEATH PENALTY (PROS) Threat of Death Penalty Rate of Homicide Decreases Death Penalty Fails to Rehabilitate I belong to a group called Parents of Murdered Children (POMC). One of the woman came forward and told me how her husband shot and killed her five year-old daughter which she witnessed on her birthday. He attempted to kill the two-year old son, too, but fortunately, the gun he was using didn’t go off a second time, because it was too old and the son’s life was sparred. Her husband’s intention was to kill the two children, and himself on her (the wife’s) birthday. He said, if I can’t have my children you won’t either. Everything to her is still a nightmare. Does not Discourage Crime penalty may not function as a significantly greater Opponents argue that there is no deterrent effect by using the death penalty. According to Baily, who did a study from l967 to l968, the death penalty was a deterrent Death is one penalty which makes error irreversible and the chance of error is inescapable when based on human judgment. On the contrary, sometimes defendants insist on execution. They feel it is an act of kindness to them. The argument here is - Is life imprisonment a crueler fate?” Is there evidence supporting the usefulness of the death penalty securing the life of the citizens (McClellan, G. 1961)?
1233 words 2300 words
1445 words 824 words
1258 words
1378 words 1549 words 2054 words 463 words
853 words 931 words 1398 words 1196 words 937 words
925 words 1212 words
924 words 2110 words 1572 words
1230 words
1558 words 971 words 718 words
1277 words
1462 words 972 words 1226 words
981 words
2196 words
2054 words
Christianity and the death penalty
copyright 2007-2008, Dudley Sharp People who oppose death penalty claim that in the implementation of this capital punishment, innocent men are wrongly executed. According to "ProDeathPenalty". there has never been any proof of it. Moreover, our criminal justice system takes extra precautions to be sure the innocent are protected. What's the use of the judges who were trained in this field? They also want to make sure who is guilty and not. Cost Issues (10) "Capital Punishment: What the Bible Says", Dr. Lloyd R. Bailey, Abingdon Press, 1987. The definitive biblical review of the death penalty. 70% of Catholics supported the death penalty as of May, 2oo5, Gallup Poll, Moral Values and Beliefs. The May 2-5, 2005 poll also found that 74% of Americans favor the death penalty for murderers, while 23% oppose. Image Credit: Garret C. In conclusion i need a lab report now, I would like to say that our Founding Fathers could not imagine a nation without capital punishment. Back in those days, there was no question of the value of public safety and personal responsibility, which brings me to my final thoughts: we as Americans have become so tolerant and have failed to discipline our children, to teach them right from wrong that we have created a generation of people who take no responsibility for their actions and expect no consequences for their behavior. I believe this is the reason the country is in the trouble that it’s in. I also support capital punishment because it’s in the Bible. The Bible is the most important book to ever be written, and Christianity is what our country was founded on, which is why I believe there is no reason to abolish capital punishment. It’s listed in several different verses throughout the Bible that a man ought to be killed himself if he kills someone else.
Regenia Moore, another one of the missing women, was last seen kicking and screaming in the cab of McDuff’s pickup truck. At the Florida State Prison in Starke in 1995 good personal essay examples, Two death row inmates were killed by their fellow inmates. A Fort Worth jury ruled that Kenneth McDuff, a Texas man, should die in the electric chair after he shot two boys and strangled and raped a girl friend of their’s. He was sentenced to life in prison after the U.S Supreme court struck down the death penalty as then imposed. McDuff was released in 1989 when Texas prisons were overflowing. Within days, the naked Imagine you’re at work. You know your daughter is getting off the bus just about this time. The thought of something bad happening to her never even crosses your mind--this is the same routine every day.
People claim that that’s Old Testament law, and it didn’t apply after the New Testament was made, but in Revelation 13:10, it says “He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints.” Abolitionists claim that people are just as safe when murderers are in prison, but some of them recruit other people to kill while they are there.
The morality of the death penalty has been hotly debated for many years. Those opposed to the death penalty say that it is immoral for the government to take the life of a citizen under any circumstance. This argument is refuted by Immanuel Kant who put forth the idea that, “a society that is not willing to demand a life of somebody who has taken somebody else’s life is simply immoral” (ProCon.org). It is immoral to not properly punish a person who has committed such a horrendous crime. The criminal is also executed humanely; in no way is he subjected to torture or any form of cruelty. All states that use the death penalty use lethal injection; the days of subjecting a prisoner to hanging or the electric chair are long gone in the US. Inmates are first given a large dose of an anesthetic so they do not feel any pain (Bosner); this proves that the process is made as humane as possible so the inmates do not physically suffer. Although the issue of morality is very personal for many people, it is important to see the facts and realize that capital punishment does take morality into account and therefore is carried out in the best way possible. Budziszewski, J. “Capital Punishment: The Case for Justice.” OrthodoxyToday.org. August 2004. Web. 29 March 2013. <http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/articles4/BudziszewskiPunishment.php> The death penalty also carries out retribution justly. “Deserved punishment protects society morally by restoring this just order, making the wrongdoer pay a price equivalent to the harm he has done.” (Budziszewski). When someone commits a crime it disturbs the order of society; these crimes take away lives write case study proposal, peace, and liberties from society. Giving the death penalty as a punishment simply restores order to society and adequately punishes the criminal for his wrongdoing. Retribution also serves justice for murder victims and their families. Some may see this as revenge, but this retribution is not motivated by malice, rather it is motivated by the need for justice and the principle of lex talionis (“an eye for an eye”) (Green). This lack of malice is proven in the simple definition of retribution: “retribution is a state sponsored, rational response to criminality that is justified given that the state is the victim when a crime occurs” (“Justifications for Capital Punishment). The death penalty puts the scales of justice back in balance after they were unfairly tipped towards the criminal. The audience for this essay is the opinion section of the Sunday New York Times. This publication has a wide readership. The largest percentage of readers are between the ages of 35 and 44, and the majority of readers have either a college degree or a graduate degree. This essay argues for a question of value. “…No system of justice can produce results which are 100% certain all the time. Mistakes will be made in any system which relies upon human testimony for proof. We should be vigilant to uncover and avoid such mistakes. Our system of justice rightfully demands a higher standard for death penalty cases. However, the risk of making a mistake with the extraordinary due process applied in death penalty cases is very small, and there is no credible evidence to show that any innocent persons have been executed at least since the death penalty was reactivated in 1976…The inevitability of a mistake should not serve as grounds to eliminate the death penalty any more than the risk of having a fatal wreck should make automobiles illegal…” (ProCon.org) Green, Melissa S. “The Death Penalty: Specific Issues.” Justice Center, University of Alaska Anchorage. 24 March 2005. Web. 28 March 2013. <http://justice.uaa.alaska.edu/death/issues.html> The eighth amendment to the United States Constitution prevents cruel and unusual punishment. Many opponents of capital punishment say that execution is cruel and unusual punishment and therefore violates the Constitution. As was stated earlier, the recipient of the death penalty is treated humanely and is not tortured in any way, shape, or form. After the anesthetic is administered the person feels no pain; the only part of the process that could be considered painful is when the IV is inserted, but that is done in hospitals on a daily basis and no one is calling it unconstitutional. The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the death penalty as constitutional in cases they have presided over. In the case of Furman v. Georgia the court stated, “The punishment of death is not cruel, within the meaning of that word as used in the Constitution. It implies there is something more inhuman and barbarous, than the mere extinguishment of life” (Lowe). The Supreme Court has not found capital punishment to be unconstitutional, and therefore this argument for abolition is invalid. It does not matter what race or economic status a person is, if he is guilty he must receive the appropriate punishment, which in some cases may be the death penalty.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
ArchivesCategories |