Greenblatt, Alan. “Upward Mobility.” CQ Researcher 15.16 (June 2005): 369–392. CQ Researcher Online. Web. 3 July 2009. “The New Boomers.” Scientific American 301.1 (July 2009): 28–28. Military & Government Collection. Web. 9 July 2009. World War II marked the last war that received full American support. The draft, known today as compulsory conscription, was an integral part of that war. Seventy percent of American men aged 18 to 35 served. The common experience shared amongst these men created lifetime friendships for an entire generation. No other conflict since then has come close to producing such national unification and pride of citizenry. So states Charles Moskos writing a contrast essay, late professor of sociology for Northwestern University, recipient of the Distinguished Service Award for the U.S. Army, and a draftee for the U.S. Army Combat Engineers (Moskos). Currently, however, according to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, the official estimate of the American veteran population is approximately 24,816,000 (“Veteran”). Total U.S. population exceeds 301 million people (“The New Boomers”). In other words help me write a scholarship essay, the ratio of veterans to the total U.S. population is less than 10%. Comparison of these figures reflects that American enlistment ratios in the U.S. Armed forces have decreased dramatically since World War II. The U.S. is a dominant military force in the world today; however, it also has allies that it must help protect and defend in the name of democracy. As a result of the above, American forces are involved in multi-theater (or diverse worldwide) roles, both simultaneously and continuously, thus spreading out our troops over diverse areas. Additionally, the extended war on terrorism continues to deplete American military forces, and international news reflects American discord and varying degrees of enthusiasm in continued war efforts. Consequently, since only one in ten Americans has served in the armed forces, American understanding of military requirements is diminishing, right along with the unity that comes with such knowledge. Thus, the realization that American safety walks hand in hand with a strong military never hits home to the majority of today’s American citizens. Compulsory conscription needs reinstating to reestablish true American citizenship and national unification of the people, thereby resulting in the expansion of U.S. troops and increased homeland security. Furthermore, those who oppose the draft feel that in a free society, the choice to serve or not to serve in the military is a constitutional right, and mandatory military service is an infringement upon this right. In other words, a draft will raise ethical issues by forcing Americans to join the armed forces against their will. Low morale will ensue, and the military’s all-around quality will decline (“National”). Furthermore, enforcement of military service by the government upon citizens implies a grantor-grantee relationship and that the government is not a true protector of American rights warns Doug Bandow, former special assistant to President Reagan and his Military Manpower Task Force. He also observes that freedom is not a gift from a king or the state requiring the paying of homage, as this would reflect a feudalistic writing scientific research papers, fascist, and socialistic point of view (371). In other words, a free American’s rights are not a privilege bestowed by the government research proposal for phd, but the rights of a free society. In comparison, especially if military service is life threatening, forcing Americans into service might not fit the definition of a free country (“National”). Consequently, some Americans consider reinstatement of the draft to be unconstitutional, as allowing its future implementation is in direct conflict with the definition of a free society. Given, if taken at face value, enforcing the draft upon the “free” society of America may indeed appear to be an infringement of American rights. Nevertheless, these same free Americans should want to defend themselves, their homes, and their country in the very name of freedom. Their freedom is a direct result of the draft during the War of Independence (Kestnbaum 24). American citizens should be proud of America’s hard-won freedom and the privileges that result from that freedom. Therefore, doesn’t it follow that continuation of freedom be underscored by implementation of the draft? Indeed, if citizens construe national service as a duty they owe to their country, why not enforce its implementation the same as contractual duties? Additionally, Jim Lehrer, a former Marine Corps soldier during the 1950s, gratefully comments that his forced service to his country changed his life. He insists his service permanently reconnected him to the rest of the world outside of himself and, furthermore, that these connections are essential for the continued success of a democratic society (“National”). Obviously a rose for emily essay, reinstating compulsory service is a benefit to the United States by not only reintroducing citizen pride in defending America, but also by unifying America as a whole. Moskos, Charles C. A Call to Civic Service: National Service for Country and Community. New York: The Free Press, 1988. Print. Kestnbaum, Meyer. “Citizenship and Compulsory Military Service: The Revolutionary Origins of Conscription in the United States.“ Armed Forces & Society (Transaction Publishers) 27.1 (Fall 2000): 7–36. Academic Search Premier. Web. 2 July 2009. In conclusion, while there is dissension, the United States needs to reinstitute compulsory conscription. The increase in American citizen participation in the army will broaden their understanding and acceptance of military responsibilities and concerns. Eventually, military volunteerism will result once the public understands the true meaning of citizenship. Once again, the public will be a well-informed public. Unification between the military and the American civilian worlds will occur, and American national pride will increase. The resultant expansion of the U.S. armed forces will ensure American safety. However, Congress and the Pentagon need to act on draft implementation before it is too late. Today, the world recognizes the United States as a dominant military force, and its citizens live in a free nation and enjoy many rights and comforts as a part of that recognition. Very shortly, this may no longer be the case, as freedom needs continuous protection made difficult by a war-torn and depleted army. Unfortunately, the low number of American military forces threatens the freedom of American society. Without increasing military personnel write personal story essay, freedom will become a thing of the past. Future generations of America will no longer live in the same United States. Oppression, violence, and the loss of civil rights will become their reality. As Ronald Reagan’s words of wisdom confirm: This is Carol Rivers’ research paper, printed and edited with her permission. The manuscript must be paginated in the upper right-hand corner in the header using student’s last name and page number. Brimley, Shawn. “Crafting Strategy in an Age of Transition.” Parameters: U.S. Army War College 38.4 (Winter 2008): 27–42. Military & Government Collection. Web. 2 July 2009. Research papers customarily use third person, not “you” or “I.” Galston, William. “Should the All Volunteer Force Be Replaced by Universal Mandatory National Service? Pro.” Congressional Digest 85.7 (Sep. 2006): 208–220. Military & Government Collection. Web. 2 July 2009. PDF Second-year course in African American studies Reading these papers will help you learn about organizing an argument and working with sources. The papers also demonstrate the use of MLA style to document sources and the formatting of the margins, line spacing, and other physical attributes of a printed paper. The MLA’s guidelines on formatting papers appear elsewhere on this site. Once you have determined who your reader is, you will want to consider how you might best reach him or her. If, for example, you are an authority on a subject and you are writing to readers who know little or nothing about it word format for essays, then you'll want to take an informative stance. If you aren't yet confident about a topic, and you have more questions than answers, you might want to take an inquisitive stance. How does one move from personal response to analytical writing? Consider Your Position--
1. Academic writing is writing done by scholars for other scholars. This means you. As a college student, you are part of a community of scholars engaged in activities that scholars have been engaged in for centuries: you will read about, think about, argue about, and write about great ideas. Constructing An Informed Argument
Analyze. This step in constructing an informed argument asks you first to consider the parts of your topic and then to examine how these parts relate to each other or to the whole. To analyze a text(s), you may want to break the stories down by examining particular scenes, point of view, and so on. In short how to write an essay proposal mla, you'll want to ask: What are the components of this story, and how do these components contribute to the story's theme? How do they contribute to the author's work as a whole? When you analyze a literary essay, you break the whole into parts so that you might see the whole differently. In the process of analysis, you find things that you might say. Why do I think so? Much of what you learned in high school will be useful to you as you approach writing in college: you will want to write clearly, to have an interesting and arguable thesis, to construct paragraphs that are coherent and focused, and so on. The first thing that you'll need to understand is that writing in college is a particular kind of writing essay types of, called "academic writing." Academic writing might be defined in many ways, there are three concepts that you need to understand before you write your first academic paper.
What do I need to know? Still, many students enter college relying on writing strategies that served them well in high school but that won't work well for research papers. The five-paragraph theme, for example, is not sophisticated or flexible enough to provide a sound structure for a college paper. Also, many old tricks -- such as using elevated language or repeating yourself so that you might meet a ten-page requirement -- will fail you now. It is obvious when a student pads a paper by using these old tricks. Understand, however, that "adding something of your own" is not an invitation simply to bring your own personal associations, reactions, or experiences to the reading of a text. To create an informed argument, you must first recognize that your writing should be analytical rather than personal. In other words, your writing must show that your associations, reactions, and experiences of a text have been framed in a critical, rather than a personal, way. What DON'T I know about my topic? However, if you are asked to write an academic paper on the short story, then you will want to know more. You will want to have certain terms in hand so that you can explain what Alexie is doing in key moments. You will want to be familiar with Alexie's other works so that you can understand what themes are important to him and his work. Moreover, if you are this short story in an upper-level literature class, you will want to be aware of different critical perspectives on Alexie's work and on American Indian literature in general, so that you can "place" your argument within the larger ongoing conversation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
ArchivesCategories |